As you are probably aware, our contemporary English content is now available through Lexico.com (https://www.lexico.com/en), and our old English dictionary site no longer exists.

As a result of this, this forum is now closed.

The English dictionary community team would like the opportunity to say a huge thanks to all of you who participated by posting questions and helping other community members.
We hope this forum was useful, and that you enjoyed being a part of it.

If you would like to get in touch with any OED-related queries, please write to
[email protected]

And if you would like to contribute suggestions to the OED, please do so by visiting: https://public.oed.com/contribute-to-the-oed/

Thank you very much indeed, and good bye!
The community team

Is this gramatically correct

"someone's friend has four horses"
Please help me.
Thank you..

Comments

  • DavidCrosbieDavidCrosbie ✭✭✭
    edited June 29

    @Sk78843

    The sentence is perfectly grammatical.

    It does sounds a little strange — but not because of the grammar.
    It would be unusual to refer to a person as 'someone's friend' — but not impossible. For example:

    We need four horses for the carnival procession. Can the club members provide them?
    None of the members can help, but someone's friend has four horses.

    PS
    When I say

    It would be unusual to refer to a person as 'someone's friend'

    I mean that it would be unusual to use the expression at the start of a clause as the SUBJECT.
    It would not be at all unusual to use it elsewhere in the clause. For example:

    He's someone's friend.
    Give it to someone's friend.
    We could allow someone's friend to do it.

Sign In or Register to comment.