As you are probably aware, our contemporary English content is now available through Lexico.com (https://www.lexico.com/en), and our old English dictionary site no longer exists.

As a result of this, this forum is now closed.

The English dictionary community team would like the opportunity to say a huge thanks to all of you who participated by posting questions and helping other community members.
We hope this forum was useful, and that you enjoyed being a part of it.

If you would like to get in touch with any OED-related queries, please write to
[email protected]

And if you would like to contribute suggestions to the OED, please do so by visiting: https://public.oed.com/contribute-to-the-oed/

Thank you very much indeed, and good bye!
The community team

Mysterious absences from the online OED

In one short session, I have looked up three simple words that aren't fully defined in the online OED:

  • frog, meaning the indentation in one side of a house-brick (cognate with the indentation in a horse's hoof, which is mentioned)
  • swath, being an alternative spelling used in the USA for swathe, but perhaps with a slightly different meaning
  • lay, meaning a narrative song (associated with minstrels)

Is there a simple explanation for the absence of these words (and, I'm sure, many more)?

Comments

    • Both spellings are given for swath(e).
    • There's a full entry for lay n.4.

    Are you confusing the OED with the short selective Oxford Online dictionary?

  • Two thoughts, Harry.

    1. If you have a borrower's number from your local library, you might be able to access the OED online.

    2. If you have written documentation for the 'notch in a brick' sense of frog, you might think of sending it to the OED editors. Simone or one of her team could tell you how.

  • SimoneSimone admin
    edited May 13

    Hi @HarryAudus

    As @DavidCrosbie mentioned above, when there is enough evidence of a new word or sense, it can be considered for inclusion in the OED.

    Unfortunately, there are indeed gaps in the dictionary, so the editors are always very happy to receive leads on new word trends.
    You are very welcome to send your suggestion in by using this link for submitting suggestions to the OED.
    But as I mentioned above there would have to be sufficient evidence for a particular word for it to be considered.

    I hope this is useful, and many thanks for your feedback!

Sign In or Register to comment.