As you are probably aware, our contemporary English content is now available through Lexico.com (https://www.lexico.com/en), and our old English dictionary site no longer exists.

As a result of this, this forum is now closed.

The English dictionary community team would like the opportunity to say a huge thanks to all of you who participated by posting questions and helping other community members.
We hope this forum was useful, and that you enjoyed being a part of it.

If you would like to get in touch with any OED-related queries, please write to
[email protected]

And if you would like to contribute suggestions to the OED, please do so by visiting: https://public.oed.com/contribute-to-the-oed/

Thank you very much indeed, and good bye!
The community team

Verb agreement

Hi
Food and wine (was / were) reserved.

Comments

  • edited February 22

    Sorry, I made a mistake , the correct sentence is:
    Food and wine (was / were) served.
    Was or were? Why?

  • Even though "food" and "wine" are considered uncountable nouns, when they are used together, with conjunction "and" they become plural. Therefore, you should use the plural form were.

    Regards,
    Alan.

  • DavidCrosbieDavidCrosbie ✭✭✭

    Both was and were are OK, but they mean slightly different things.

    Food and wine was served means 'a combination of food and wine was served'.

    Food and wine was served means 'food was served and wine was served'.

    OK, there's very little difference, but these are two ways of seeing the same event.

    In the first, the writer sees the event as typical hospitality.

    In the second, the writer describes the particular form of hospitality.

    The second version with were is more normal. but the first is not impossible.

Sign In or Register to comment.