As you are probably aware, our contemporary English content is now available through Lexico.com (https://www.lexico.com/en), and our old English dictionary site no longer exists.

As a result of this, this forum is now closed.

The English dictionary community team would like the opportunity to say a huge thanks to all of you who participated by posting questions and helping other community members.
We hope this forum was useful, and that you enjoyed being a part of it.

If you would like to get in touch with any OED-related queries, please write to
[email protected]

And if you would like to contribute suggestions to the OED, please do so by visiting: https://public.oed.com/contribute-to-the-oed/

Thank you very much indeed, and good bye!
The community team

Relations between events

Hello!

They knocked down a lot of houses when they built the new road.

Are the two events here consecutive or not?
Thank you in advance!

Comments

  • DavidCrosbieDavidCrosbie ✭✭✭
    edited February 2018

    All the grammar tells us is that there was some correspondence between the event of knocking down the houses and the period of building the road. Common sense tells us that the process of road building started much earlier — at a drawing-board, perhaps. We're not told how much physical work was done before the demolition, or whether that physical work included some road-laying. We aren't told because it isn't relevant.

    The grammar doesn't tell us that the road building was the reason for knocking down the houses, but we immediately assume that it was. If there wasn't a causal connection, it's just perverse to mention the two things in the same sentence.

Sign In or Register to comment.