Best Of

It isn't a tense, @Ritsu.

You've been misled by the term PAST PARTICIPLE. That verb form could just as well be called a PASSIVE PARTICIPLE.

There's nothing unusual in using this form as an ADJECTIVE. Think of

known, increased, damaged, closed, fried, depressed ...

Dedicated passes all the tests for recognising a word as an adjective.

1. It can be used before a noun — e.g. a dedicated doctor
2. It can be used after be — e.g. She's dedicated
3. It can be used with very — e.g. They're very dedicated
4. It can be used comparatively — e.g. She's more dedicated than you

The first problem to tackle is articles — frequently a nightmare for Russians speaking of writing English. Because of the phrase of the Russian Federation development you must write

the strategic goals.

That's probably my only grammatical objection, but there are other things that could be improved.

You seem to be writing about goals of development — adding as extra information strategic and of the Russian federation. I think it would be better if you change to development goals. Thus:

achieving the strategic development goals of the Russian Federation

I don't see why your first clause is PASSIVE. It gives too much importance to the words is considered. Another problem with having is considered in the middle of your sentence is that it leads the reader to expect a clause with a different verb after the comma.

These problems disappear if you start with ACTIVE

This paper [or dissertation or whatever] considers the role ...

After the comma you could then write

and also the provisions...

I'm not sure why you write program rather than Program. If it's the official name of a program, then all the content-words should be capitalised. Thus

the Digital Economy of the Russian Federation Program

— although I suspect it's better described as

the Digital Economy Program of the Russian Federation

He is a boy.

• Don't you mean X? = 'I think you mean X. Am I right?'

• Do you mean X? = 'I don't know whether you mean X or not. Which is true?'

Articles are useful in making complicated sentences much clearer.

If you want to write about
1. an application
2. an approval process
then you should help the reader by using two articles.

The only time it's helpful to omit the second article is when the two noun represent a closely related pair of things such as the top and bottom, the start and finish, the mother and father. There are two problems with application and approval process

• The meaning: They're not an obvious pair
• The difference in form: One is a single noun and the other is a compound of two nouns

The other article problem was with the word loan. This is a COUNTABLE NOUN, so the grammar insists on an article or some other DETERMINER before the SINGULAR form:
a loan, the loan, this loan, that loan, my loan, your loan etc or the NUMERAL one loan

Before the plural form loans we can have no article if the meaning is INDEFINITE. Some grammar books call this the ZERO ARTICLE.

The only other use of a ZERO ARTICLE is when the noun is UNCOUNTABLE.

Home-construction is an example. Although the simple noun construction can be COUNTABLE (one construction, two constructions etc) it can also be ABSTRACT and grammatically UNCOUNTABLE. The compound home-construction could possibly be used to mean 'one example of a home being built' but this would be unusual and possibly confusing. It normally refers to the ABSTRACT concept of constructing homes, so we would say
a loan for home-construction
not
a loan for a home-construction.

Approval is another noun that is UNCOUNTABLE in the sense that you're using it — in the phrase approval process. This can be rephrased as
the process of approval
not
the process of an approval.

The first won't do, but Farcical Tales is a possible phrase.

There's a difference between farce and a farce, so you must decide which you mean,

A farce (PLURAL farces) is a comic play of a particular type .

You can also use a farce to mean 'a situation which is like a farce'.

[I don't think I'd use the PLURAL farces to mean 'situations which are like farces']

Farce (no PLURAL) is the genre, that is to say the type of comedy.

I suggest you look carefully at the examples for meanings 1, 1.1 and 1.2 here:

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/farce

An important question is whether you are discussing a variety of plays (or situations) or just one.

The only justification for Tales of a Farce is if there are several stories concerning one play (or situation)

'Monday's, Tuesday's and Wednesday's meetings were cancelled.' is more logical.

Strictly speaking 'Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday's meetings were cancelled.' states that Monday was cancelled, Tuesday was cancelled and Wednesday's meetings were cancelled. However, nobody would assume that you meant to say this.

Personally I would prefer to say
'Monday's, Tuesday's and Wednesday's meetings were all cancelled.'
or
All meetings were cancelled for Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday.

Normally, I would mark with possessive -'s each possessor in a chain linked by and — with these exceptions
1. One possession is shared e.g. John and Mary's house
2. The possessors constitute a group e.g. the King and Queen's various attendants, Oxford and Cambridge's Colleges,

In writing, I would avoid possessive -'s forms for non-human possessors e.g. the meetings on Monday, Tuesday and Wednessday, the Colleges of Oxford and Cambridge

Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday is just a list of days — no more a group than Saturday, Thursday and Friday or any other selection.

A rule of thumb — that is, a simple rule which is almost always true — is that you shouldn't mix to- forms and -ing forms.

Hamlet doesn't say To be or not being and he doesn't say Being or not to be.

We say Seeing is believing. We don't say Seeing is to believe or To see is believing.

This is why we wouldn't say
Going out with your friends is more interesting than to go out with your family.

The most natural version is
Going out with your friends is more interesting than going out with your family.

But it's also possible to say
To go out with your friends is more interesting than to go out with your family.

(I would repeat the word out because go and go out have very different meanings.)