Missing thesaurus for 'dumb'
Categories
- 339 All Categories
- 3 Language datasets
- 9 News and updates
- 23 API endpoints
- 17 Review my code
- 6 Tutorials and presentations
- 92 Frequently asked questions
- 7 How to get useful technical help
- 2 Member guidelines
- 12 Suggest an improvement
- 59 Report a bug
- 10 Ask the Community: Other
- 58 Ask the Community: Technical and operational questions
- 62 General
Missing thesaurus for 'dumb'
shahood
Member ✭✭
in Report a bug
Hi @AmosDuveen
Entries endpoint reports that the word 'dumb' has a definition with sense_id = m_en_gbus0302860.013 and it has thesaurus_links having sense_id = t_en_gb0004525.002. But Thesaurus endpoint doesn't have any entries with sense_id = "t_en_gb0004525.002.
Seems like an error!
Best Answer
-
AmosDuveen
Member, Administrator, Moderator admin
Yup, I think the V2 output will provide all three senses but, as a result, the V1 output won't actually get fixed.
Answers
Hi @shahood,
Yup, that looks like an error to me. The entire .002 sense is missing from the thesaurus response. Thankfully, it looks like it's going to get fixed fairly soon by some changes we have in the pipeline.
Hi @AmosDuveen should we expect the fix in the upcoming ver 2?
@AmosDuveen Fair enough. Thanks!
Hi @AmosDuveen
Yes it's been fixed in V2.